Federal Court Rejects Claims of Harassment and Retaliation
A federal judge has ruled against a former Delaware State Trooper, Nicole Oldham, in her lawsuit alleging discrimination, sexual harassment, and retaliation. Oldham, 49, claimed she endured a hostile work environment for over 16 years.
Years of Alleged Abuse Detailed in Lawsuit
Oldham’s lawsuit outlined a pattern of harassment beginning in 2002 and continuing until her termination in 2018. She described a workplace rife with sexual misconduct, misogyny, and retaliation against those who spoke out. The lawsuit included graphic details of alleged abuse, including rumors of sexual activity with subordinates and a state lawmaker.
Judge Finds Claims Time-Barred or Lacking Severity
U.S. District Judge Richard Andrews dismissed many of Oldham’s claims due to the passage of time. He argued that she failed to demonstrate a consistent pattern of harassment by the same individuals. Additionally, the judge ruled that some claims, while concerning, did not rise to the level of “severe and pervasive” harassment required under the law.
Medical Reasons Upheld for Termination
Judge Andrews also sided with the Delaware State Police regarding Oldham’s termination. Medical documentation submitted by healthcare providers indicated “permanent disability,” potentially hindering her ability to return to full duty. This information, the judge ruled, justified Colonel McQueen’s decision to terminate Oldham’s employment.
