Decision Focuses on Secular Purpose, Not Individual Beliefs
A Missouri judge has dismissed a lawsuit challenging the state’s abortion ban on religious grounds. The lawsuit, filed by a coalition of Christian, Jewish, and Unitarian Universalist leaders, argued that the law violates the state constitution by imposing religious views on all residents.
Plaintiffs Sought to Block Enforcement of Ban
The religious groups sought a permanent injunction against the abortion ban and a declaration that specific provisions within the law violate the state constitution. One section of the statute references “Almighty God” and “unalienable Rights” granted by a creator.
Judge Finds No Imposition of Religious Beliefs
However, Judge Jason Sengheiser disagreed. He noted that similar language exists in the state constitution’s preamble, acknowledging a “Supreme Ruler of the Universe.” He further highlighted that the challenged provisions lack explicit religious language.
Focus on State’s Historical Regulation of Abortion
In his ruling, Sengheiser emphasized the state’s history of restricting abortion, citing laws dating back over a century. He concluded that the overturning of Roe v. Wade simply opened the door for further regulation, not a shift towards religious motivation.
Judge Acknowledges Potential Religious Beliefs of Lawmakers
The judge acknowledged that some legislators supporting the ban may hold religious views on abortion. However, he argued that this doesn’t equate to forcing those beliefs on others.
