Religious Groups Sue Trump Administration Over Immigration Arrests at Houses of Worship

Lawsuit Challenges Immigration Crackdown

Twenty-seven religious groups, including the Episcopal Church, the Union for Reform Judaism, and the Mennonites, filed a federal lawsuit Tuesday against the Trump administration’s expanded immigration enforcement policy. The lawsuit argues that the policy, which allows immigration agents to arrest people at houses of worship without prior approval, violates religious freedom by instilling fear and lowering attendance at services and community programs.

Fear and Disruption in Places of Worship

Religious leaders say the new policy has caused undocumented worshippers to avoid services, fearing arrest.

“We cannot worship freely if some of us are living in fear,” said the Most Rev. Sean Rowe, presiding bishop of the Episcopal Church.

The lawsuit highlights concerns that the policy disrupts churches’ ability to provide food banks, homeless shelters, and other aid to undocumented immigrants.

Government Defends the Policy

The Department of Homeland Security defended the policy, arguing that it prevents criminals from using places of worship as safe havens.

A Department of Justice memo stated that immigration enforcement at houses of worship has long been allowed and that concerns over future harm are speculative.

A Growing Legal Battle

This lawsuit follows a similar challenge filed in January by Quaker congregations. The plaintiffs, representing millions of worshippers, hope their case will force the administration to reconsider the policy.

Kelsi Corkran, lead counsel for the lawsuit, emphasized that religious teachings demand the protection of migrants.

“Scripture and tradition offer irrefutable unanimity on embracing and serving refugees, asylum seekers, and immigrants,” she said.

Divided Opinions on the Policy

While many religious leaders oppose the crackdown, conservative legal experts argue that places of worship should not be used to shield undocumented immigrants.

“Fugitives or criminals are not immune from the law merely because they enter a place of worship,” said Mat Staver of Liberty Counsel.

Professor Cathleen Kaveny of Boston College questioned the legal basis of the lawsuit but suggested the administration risks alienating faith communities.

“These buildings are different — almost like embassies,” she said. “Churches belong to an eternal country.”